This would allow Burns and McDonnell to match any of the bids or to amend its offer into a better option. The city opened the project to all bidders on May 30, asking that proposals be submitted no later than June 20.Ī “Swiss challenge” process will be used to select the best bid for the terminal project because Burns & McDonnell made an unsolicited offer to privately finance the project, said city manager Troy Schulte. Kansas City-based Burns & McDonnell offered in early May to privately finance and build the new passenger terminal that would be operated by the city but engineering firm AECOM said two weeks later that it wanted an opportunity to finance, design, build, and operate the terminal.ĪECOM amended its offer to drop the operations and maintenance provisions in its offer after several council members said they did not want the city-owned passenger terminal operated by a private company. “As you know, rarely do airlines agree on something but in the case of KCI, we are currently in agreement on this,” he said. The terminal proposal would have to be approved by Kansas City voters under an ordinance adopted by the council in February 2014 that gives residents the final say “before the city demolishes or replaces any terminal at any city-controlled airport.”ĭelaying the election would require the airlines to revise the three-year-old estimate of $964 million for the new facility that will replace three terminals with a single building, Sisneros said. “The longer it takes for this to move forward, the greater the challenges are to both our customers and our employees who work at KCI.” “It would be unfortunate if the election was further delayed into 2018, but it’s ultimately the city’s decision to proceed or not,” he said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |